Technical Verification & Benchmark Evidence

Transparent audit logs, reproduction steps, test environments, tool outputs, and known limitations for every performance, accessibility, and schema claim made on this website.

Testing Methodology & Concept Separation

To maintain scientific integrity and recruit trust, this site explicitly distinguishes synthetic laboratory scores, field Web Vitals, automated scans, and manual WCAG evaluations:

Lighthouse Performance Score

A synthetic laboratory score measured under simulated mobile (Moto G Power, 4G throttling) or desktop conditions. Useful for regression testing, but not identical to real-world user experiences.

Core Web Vitals

Specific performance metrics evaluating Largest Contentful Paint (LCP), Interaction to Next Paint (INP), and Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) measured in lab and field environments.

WCAG 2.1 AA Conformance

Requires comprehensive manual and automated evaluation against all applicable Web Content Accessibility Guidelines success criteria across color, keyboard navigation, and screen reader announcements.

Automated Accessibility Scans

Automated tools (axe-core 4.9, Lighthouse) detect automated violations (~30–40% of WCAG criteria). Automated 100/100 scores are necessary but not sufficient alone to claim total manual WCAG compliance.

Evidence Logs

Explore Specific Verification Audits

Performance Audit Log

Lab Lighthouse 12.0 performance runs, FCP/LCP timings, CLS layout measurements, and reproduction CLI commands.

Accessibility Audit Log

Automated axe-core 4.9 scan results (0 violations), NVDA/VoiceOver manual testing notes, keyboard trap audits, and contrast checks.

Schema & Graph Validation Log

JSON-LD `@graph` node linkage reports, Google Rich Results Test validations, and W3C Nu HTML validator logs.

Project Results Matrix

Cross-project benchmark data for DiceRoller, Nepal Construction Platform, and Developer Portfolio mapped to test releases.